- 22
- Sep
- 09
Editor’s Note: Yesterday a frequent conspirator of mine hosted the following exchange on his Facebook page. He had posted on the controversy that seems limited to the blogosphere over footage capturing a producer from Fox News leading the crowd at the 9/12 Project’s march on Washington in cheering to capture a live shot for the cameras. The footage is below:
The link to the video drew the attention of a teabagger and, of course, your editor couldn’t resist. The exchange is reposted as a case study of how quickly and easily a neo-conservative’s hypocrisy can be exposed.
Peter
Free speech is a tough concept for some people to understand.
Yesterday at 7:24am
Rob Spectre
There is a difference between covering the news and being the news. A producer taking the mike on stage and a commentator organizing the rally are not documenting a event, they are manufacturing it.
Yesterday at 10:58am
Peter
If FNC was the only outlet I might be more concerned. Freedom of speech means something.
Yesterday at 11:08am
Rob Spectre
Indeed, but so does journalism, and in a healthy democracy the two should bear some truth in advertising.
Yesterday at 11:30am
Peter
Let the market and the people decide. That which is true eventually prevails. Further despite all the journalism going on we have a blissfully uniformed electorate.
Yesterday at 12:38pm
Rob Spectre
I think it was pretty obvious from the last election that they did, however dishonesty should be identified whether it comes from a public or private source.
Engaging in free speech in a free market comes pre-bundled with responsibility, and those who are cavalier with both should rightly expect to be exposed.
Yesterday at 12:43pm
Peter
Really?! The American press is seldom responsible or demonstrates restraint nor should it. It is called freedom…funny how when the left attacks the right it is about freedom and when the right attacks the left it is about responsibility. You need some intellectual honesty about when talking about freedom of the press.
Yesterday at 12:51pm
Rob Spectre
I’m not sure I follow. My argument is that the Fox News producer that was MCing a rally she was assigned to cover was dishonest journalism, not that she should not be free to do so. I don’t think I said anything about her or her employer’s civil liberties which certainly include manufacturing a rally for the sake of spectacle, just as my civil liberties include identifying it for what it is.
Yesterday at 12:58pm
Peter
Dishonest journalism? What was dishonest about it? The fact they didn’t disclose they didn’t support Obama? Well the failure to disclose is rampant in the industry. Frankly I am not sure why anyone is surprised or outraged by this. Journalism is a profession that is not populated with particularly intelligent, honest or competent men and women. The practice of journalism is full of those who ‘want to make a difference’ or ‘want to change the world’ but lack the intellectual resources or entrepreneurial spirit to actually do anything other the comment on the proceeding of greater men.
Yesterday at 2:09pm
Rob Spectre
Again, a bit fuzzy on your position. Are you suggesting that since everybody in journalism is stupid, it is okay for Fox News to be dishonest?
Yesterday at 2:19pm
Peter
Yep. It is equally ok for CBS to make up evidence, MSNBC to cheerlead for the left and CNN to be pretty much irrelevant. That is the marketplace of ideas and there are no rules on playing fair nor should there be. Since the Revolution the press has been as corrupted by political favoritism and the ideology of the one running the printer. The notion of Fair and Balanced is not dead because it never existed in the first place.
Yesterday at 2:49pm
Rob Spectre
I guess I have a little trouble reconciling “What was dishonest about it?” with “Yes, it is okay for Fox News to be dishonest, just like everyone else.”

(Votes: 2 Score: 8 Rating: 4.00)
(Votes: 2 Score: 9 Rating: 4.50)




